Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2933 14
Original file (NR2933 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001:
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN .
Docket No:NRO2933-14
5 June 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TO: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: SE a enenenneemmanannmnrsaste

Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2} Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5400 PERS-806 of
13 May 2014
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
scrolled approved for an officer appointment as a CWO3 with a
Date of Rank of 1 November 2013 vice 1 December 2013.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and

George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 28 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing Law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy. _

b. In correspondence attached as. enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:

a. Petitioner’s was scrolled approved for and accepted an
Officer Appointment as a CWO3 with an effective date of
advancement and a Date of Rank of i November 2013 vice 1
December 2013.

Note: Petitioner’s lineal number shall be adjusted accordingly
by the Naval Personnel Command.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Gone

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRONTE I. MONTG R

Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

5 June 2014 eet Fh

‘ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2914 14

    Original file (NR2914 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was scrolled approved for an officer appointment as a CWO3 with a Date of Rank of 1 November 2013 vice 1 December 2013. ‘The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2468 14

    Original file (NR2468 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was scrolled approved for an officer appointment as a CWO3 with a Date of Rank of 1 November 2013 vice 1 December 2013. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2445 14

    Original file (NR2445 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval recora be corrected to show that Petitioner was scrolled approved for an officer appointment as a CWO3 with a Date of Rank of 1 October 2013 vice 1 November 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6490 14

    Original file (NR6490 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the- applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's Date of Rank to CWO3 be corrected to show a date of 1 October 2013 vice 1 November 2013, now of record. © 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Fxnicios, Ms. McCain and Ms. Aldrich reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined ‘that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0747 14

    Original file (NR0747 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Docket No:NRO0747-14 CONCLUSTON Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02007-06

    Original file (02007-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer 3 (CWO3) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 CWO3 Selection Board, vice the FY 2006 CWO3 Selection Board. They specifically...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2992 14

    Original file (NR2992 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner signed and accepted her officer Appointment Acceptance and Oath of Office on 24 May 2013 yiee 3 July 2013, that her Pay Entry Base Date (PEBD) he corrected toe reflect the same and that she be reimbursed all pay and allowances authorized due to the change . 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalmen, Exnicios...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05501-09

    Original file (05501-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his retirement on 1 November 2008 was in the grade of Chief Warrant Office 4 (CWO4), rather than CWO3, as he was promoted to CWO4 effective 1 October 2008. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Delorier, Pfeiffer and Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2624 14

    Original file (NR2624 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to have his date of rank reset to 1 June 2013 vice 1 October 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9807948

    Original file (NC9807948.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD:hd Docket No: 07948-98 24 June 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj; WH ene Be li REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. He specifically requested a date of rank and effective date of 1 December 1997. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ensley, Goldsmith and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10...